Fully Automatic Consolidation Apparatus (Mechanical) Model BTU-1DescriptionThis equipment is afully automatic consolidation apparatus (mechanical), modelBTU-1, used for one‑dimensional consolidation testing of soils. It
automatically applies loads and acquires data to determine soil
compressibility parameters (coefficient of compressibility av,
rebound modulus Es, coefficient of consolidation Cv,
pre‑consolidation pressure Pc, etc.). Main features: - Good expandable control functions
- Continuously applies 0‑5 MPa pressure (for specimen diameter
61.8 mm)
- Specimen sizes: Φ61.8×H20 mm and Φ79.8×H20 mm
- Acquisition and control software automatically obtains
consolidation parameters and plots various curves (square root of
time curve, log‑time curve, e‑p curve, e‑lg p curve, Cv‑P(T90)
curve, Cv‑P(T50) curve, H‑P curve, etc.)
Test Standards (International)- ASTM D2435(One‑dimensional consolidation of soils)
- ISO 17892‑5(Consolidation test)
- BS 1377‑6(Consolidation test)
- ASTM D4186(CRS consolidation, if supported)
- ASTM D4546(Load‑unload‑reload consolidation)
The equipment can meet the requirements of these standards for
loading, displacement measurement, data acquisition, etc. Specification| Parameter | Specification | | Model | BTU-1 | | Instrument name | Fully automatic consolidation apparatus (mechanical) | | Control function | Good expandable control functions | | Pressure range | 0‑5 MPa (continuously applied, for Φ61.8 mm specimen) | | Absolute pressure accuracy | ±1 kPa | | Specimen sizes | Φ61.8 × H20 mm and Φ79.8 × H20 mm | | Software functions | Automatically calculates av, Es, Cv, Pc, etc.; plots square root of
time curve, log‑time curve, e‑p curve, e‑lg p curve, Cv‑P(T90)
curve, Cv‑P(T50) curve, H‑P curve, etc. |
Detail- Mechanical loading– Uses a motor‑driven (servo or stepper) system to apply axial
pressure, requiring no pneumatic or hydraulic power, offering
precise control and fast response.
- Continuous pressure application– 0‑5 MPa continuously adjustable, stepless loading, suitable for
step loading or CRS continuous loading modes.
- High pressure accuracy– Absolute accuracy ±1 kPa (approx. 0.02% FS relative to 5 MPa),
far superior to conventional consolidometers.
- Two specimen sizes–
- Φ61.8×20 mm (standard ring, area 30 cm²)
- Φ79.8×20 mm (area 50 cm²), suitable for soils with slightly larger
particles or where a larger area reduces scale effects.
- Expandable control functions– May allow connection of multiple consolidation cells (multi‑unit)
or support for multiple test modes (step loading, CRS, CRL, creep,
etc.) as future upgrades.
- Powerful post‑processing software– Automatically calculates consolidation parameters and plots
standard curves, saving data processing time.
- High pressure capability– 5 MPa can simulate overburden stress at depths >200 m
(assuming γ=20 kN/m³, about 250 m).
Application- Routine consolidation tests– Determine compression index, coefficient of consolidation, and
pre‑consolidation pressure of fine‑grained soils (clay, silty
clay).
- High‑stress consolidation– 5 MPa maximum pressure suitable for deep soils, high fills, and
surcharge preloading design.
- Larger specimen size (Φ79.8 mm)– Suitable for soils containing a small amount of coarse particles,
reducing scale effects.
- Research and teaching– University soil mechanics laboratories for student experiments
and research.
- Software teaching– Automatically plots curves, helping students understand
consolidation theory.
Advantages- High‑precision pressure control– ±1 kPa absolute accuracy, far exceeding conventional
consolidometers (typically ±1% FS ≈ ±50 kPa).
- Continuous stepless loading– Allows CRS (constant rate of strain) or custom stress path
consolidation tests.
- Two specimen sizes– Flexibility to choose based on maximum particle size.
- Good expandability– Can add multiple consolidation cells or upgrade test modules.
- Comprehensive software– Automatically calculates parameters, generates curves with one
click, reducing manual plotting effort and errors.
- Mechanical loading– No air source required, clean, low noise, suitable for indoor
laboratories.
- High pressure– 5 MPa meets consolidation requirements for most depths.
What To ChooseSelect this equipment or compare with other models based on testing
requirements: | Requirement | Recommendation | Reason | | Need high‑precision consolidation testing (research grade) | Very suitable | ±1 kPa accuracy, far superior to conventional | | Need high‑pressure consolidation (>1.6 MPa) | 5 MPa meets requirements | Suitable for deep soils, high fills | | Need CRS or continuous loading consolidation | Supported (continuous pressure application) | Programmable stress/strain paths | | Specimen contains small coarse particles (≤5 mm) | Choose Φ79.8 mm cell | Reduces scale effects | | Only routine low‑pressure consolidation (≤800 kPa) | Consider a more economical model (e.g., 1.6 MPa) | This model has excess capacity | | Need multi‑unit simultaneous testing | Confirm expandability (screenshot mentions “expandable control
functions”) | May allow multiple consolidation cells | | Limited budget, only basic consolidation needed | Choose a manual or semi‑automatic consolidometer | Lower cost |
Process FlowExample:Step‑loading consolidation test (ASTM D2435) - Specimen preparation
- Cut undisturbed or remoulded specimen using a Φ61.8×20 mm or
Φ79.8×20 mm ring.
- Measure initial water content and density. If saturation is
required, soak or vacuum saturate.
- Specimen installation
- Place the ring with specimen into the consolidation cell (with
porous stones and filter paper).
- Position the cell in the loading frame and install the displacement
sensor (zero it).
- Connect the data acquisition system.
- Apply initial seating pressure
- Set a small pressure (e.g., 2‑5 kPa) via software to ensure good
contact between the loading cap and specimen; record initial
displacement reading.
- Set test parameters
- In the software, select “step‑loading consolidation module”.
- Set the load sequence (e.g., 12.5, 25, 50, 100, 200, 400, 800,
1600, 3200 kPa, up to 5 MPa).
- Set duration for each load step (e.g., 24 hours or time‑based
stability criterion, such as displacement change <0.01 mm in the
last hour).
- Set data acquisition intervals (e.g., 0.1, 1, 10, 60 minutes,
etc.).
- Start the test
- The software automatically applies the first load step via the
motor and maintains constant stress.
- The displacement sensor records vertical deformation in real time;
the software plots time‑displacement curves.
- When each load step reaches stability, the next load step is
automatically applied.
- Unloading stage (if rebound is to be measured)
- After the maximum load is reached, perform unloading (e.g., 1600,
800, 400, 200, 100, 50, 25 kPa) to determine rebound curves.
- End and disassembly
- After the test, unload to zero, remove the specimen, weigh and dry
to measure final water content (for correction).
- Data processing
- The software automatically calculates void ratio, coefficient of
compressibility av, compression index Cc, and rebound index Cs for
each load step.
- Plots e‑p curve and e‑lg p curve, determines pre‑consolidation
pressure Pc (Casagrande method).
- Calculates coefficient of consolidation Cv using the square root of
time method or log‑time method, and plots Cv‑P curves.
- Generates a test report.
If the equipment supportsCRS consolidation: Set a constant strain rate (e.g., 0.01 mm/min), apply continuous
loading while recording pore pressure (if equipped with a pore
pressure sensor); the software calculates Cv, Cc, Pc, etc., based
on CRS theory. Summary:The BTU-1 is a fully automatic mechanical consolidation apparatus
with high‑precision pressure control (±1 kPa) and a maximum
pressure of 5 MPa. It supports two specimen sizes (Φ61.8 mm and
Φ79.8 mm). The powerful acquisition and control software
automatically calculates consolidation parameters and plots various
standard curves. It is suitable for routine consolidation,
high‑pressure consolidation, and research‑grade high‑precision
testing. Selection should consider the required pressure range and
specimen size; if only low‑pressure routine consolidation is
needed, a more economical model may be considered. The expandable
control functions allow future addition of multi‑unit
configurations.
|