bamboo wood wpc board horse stables horse front stall panel divider
customized
As described in Common to All section 2.3.2, all of the action
alternatives share a common approach to improved best management
practices and enhanced public outreach and programs which is also
outlined in Chapter 1, section 1.1.1 introduction; ―Future Leasing
Program‖. As part of the preliminary planning effort, NPS collected
supplemental data about Park natural and cultural resources that
could be affected by actions under the proposed alternatives. In
2006 and again in February 2010, public scoping, open houses, and
solicitation of public comments (see Chapter 5) provided valuable
input to the alternatives. The NPS natural resource analyses
involved the use of new and existing studies and surveys. These
resources included soils, hydrology (streams, wetlands, and water
quality), wildlife, threatened and endangered species, and other
studies particular to areas potentially affected by the Marin
Equestrian Stables Plan. To address protection of cultural
resources, the NPS utilized existing studies such as historic
structures reports and then prepared a ―Determination of
Eligibility‖ for the four prior ranch sites – Lower Redwood Creek,
Golden Gate Dairy, Tennessee Valley and Lower Tennessee Valley. The
descriptions of these analyses of these historic sites are included
in Chapter 4. NPS staff identified potential uses of historic
structures and buildings within each equestrian site that would
meet equestrian program needs and fit in with the project
objectives identified earlier in the process. Criteria used to
evaluate structures included size, layout and potential for
rehabilitation. All action alternatives incorporate measures to
protect and maintain the historic features of the sites and to
improve cultural resources stewardship. In addition to the No
Action alternative, as a result of the alternatives formulation
process, three action alternatives representing a reasonable range
of alternatives were carried forward for analysis in this EA. Table
2-2 summarizes each of the four alternatives. An overview of the
equestrian facility configurations for each alternative is
presented in Section 2.3 below. See Figure 1.1 for locations.
During the CBA Workshop, Alternative B was recommended by NPS staff
as the preferred alternative. Alternative B, ―Option 2‖ or ―B2‖ was
further developed and identified as having the best combination of
a balanced financial investment, long-term benefits for achieving
project objectives, and a high level of resource protection and
enhancement. Option B2 differs from the original Alternative B (now
Alternative B, ―Option 1‖ or ―B1‖) by its removal of stable
facilities at Lower Tennessee Valley and the relocation of the Park
Horse Patrol program to Tennessee Valley stables. The preferred
alternative for the Plan implementation is Alternative B, Option 2.
The action alternatives have many elements in common; however,
Alternative B, Option 2 provides the most advantages with regard to
the evaluation factors of public benefit, public access, and
cultural and historic resource protection when compared to the
other action alternatives. Three historic sites, Golden Gate Dairy,
Tennessee Valley and Rodeo Valley, remain as stables, an
appropriate use that will help preserve these resources for future
generations. The goal of natural resource preservation will be
achieved by site improvements and environmental Best Management
Practices.
The product advantage:
1.Fully hot dip galvanized finish or powder coated surface. |
2.A full range of design and style options. |
3.Swing window & swivel feeder are optional as accessories. |
4.Wood, wire mesh, round pipe are optional as infill material. |
5.Auto- lock and sliding systems give you a good experience |